The
efficacy of Robert Merton’s concern in Bureaucratic
Structure and Personality is as relevant today as it was then. In 1940,
Merton wrote Bureaucratic Structure and
Personality to illustrate the inherent dysfunctions of bureaucracy. His
purpose was not to shame the field of public administration but to recognize
that public administration could not be solely driven simply by measures of efficiency
as adopted by scientific management because it requires employers to be cognizant
of the importance of human behavior and motivation. In addition it requires
public servants to balance efficiency with responsiveness without fear of
taking initiative on projects that may slow down their agencies efficiency but
increase the overall quality of service. At the time, the impacts of WWI, the
Depression and New Deal, and WWII had dramatically increased the size, scope,
and reach of government. The American public also exhibited a higher interest
in government and showed more trust and expectations that government could
solve societal problems (Cayer, Baker, & Weschler, 2010, p. 77) .
Today,
the efficacy of Merton’s article remains the same as U.S. public administrators
continue to struggle to find the appropriate balance between efficiency versus
responsiveness. The pathological and inherent dysfunctions of bureaucracy mainly
due to the negligence of human behavior and motivation are now ever more
present due to the move to reduce the size of government and increase
efficiency.